Theory Underground · SAARUTU — Source Brief · Postwar French Theory Shelf
This brief reconstructs the argument of The Mirror of Production so it can be rebuilt and drafted from without the book in hand. It follows Baudrillard's own sequence (Preface, then Chapters I–V, each closing on an “Epistemology” section), and carries every load-bearing formulation as a complete, page-anchored block quote rather than as paraphrase, because those passages are what travel into later writing.
The working copy is a database/HTML rendering of the Telos 1975 edition that carries the print pagination inline as -- N -- markers, so every citation below is to the print page and needs no file-to-print offset. The rendering carries occasional OCR/typesetting slips; where one falls inside a quoted passage it is preserved verbatim and listed in the apparatus at the foot of the brief. Inline footnote-reference digits that the rendering folded into the running text are dropped from quotations as the apparatus markers they are.
The book is one sustained operation: to show that Marxism does not transcend political economy but completes and interiorizes it. The wedge is that Marx critiqued the contents of political economy while leaving its two governing forms untouched, the form of production and the form of representation (Preface, established below). Against production Baudrillard sets symbolic exchange, the reciprocal, ambivalent, non-accumulative circulation of gift and counter-gift drawn from Mauss by way of Bataille, which precedes the form of value and is what the form of value destroys.
The recurring claim is that production, labor, value, need, scarcity, and the unconscious are not anthropological universals awaiting liberation but historical products of one and the same separation, so a radical position has to think beyond value rather than reverse its internal flow. The name Baudrillard gives the move Marx could not make is the critique of the political economy of the sign (Chapter I). Each chapter closes on a self-standing “Epistemology” section that turns the screw from the contents of the analysis to the form of the model, and those sections carry the most aggressive claims, so they are read here as the load-bearing argument rather than as appendices.
The Preface states the premise. The critical theory of the mode of production never reaches the principle of production, so the form of production survives its own critique intact and goes on to underwrite revolutionary discourse.
Page 17A specter haunts the revolutionary imagination: the phantom of production. Everywhere it sustains an unbridled romanticism of productivity. The critical theory of the mode of production does not touch the principle of production. All the concepts it articulates describe only the dialectical and historical genealogy of the contents of production, leaving production as a form intact. This form reemerges, idealized, behind the critique of the capitalist mode of production.
Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, page 17.
Productivist discourse is the shared ground of the system and its challenge alike, which is why Baudrillard treats the consensus as suspect rather than as common sense.
Page 17The general formula is that of a productive Eros. Social wealth or language, meaning or value, sign or phantasm — everything is “produced” according to a “labor.” If this is the truth of capital and of political economy, it is taken up whole by the revolution only to capital's benefit. The capitalist system of production is to be subverted in the name of an authentic and radical productivity.
Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, page 17.
The productivism is read through Lacan: the scheme of production is the mirror in which the species recognizes itself, and what it recognizes there is the imaginary.
Pages 19–20At the level of all political economy there is something of what Lacan describes in the mirror stage: through this scheme of production, this mirror of production, the human species comes to consciousness [la prise de conscience] in the imaginary. Production, labor, value, everything through which an objective world emerges and through which man recognizes himself objectively — this is the imaginary. Here man is embarked on a continual deciphering of himself through his works, finalized by his shadow (his own end), reflected by this operational mirror, this sort of ideal of a productivist ego.
Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, pages 19–20.
The diagnosis closes on the two forms Marx left unexamined, which sets the program for the whole book.
Page 20It is no longer worthwhile to make a radical critique of the order of representation in the name of production and of its revolutionary formula. These two orders are inseparable and, paradoxical though it may seem, Marx did not subject the form production to a radical analysis any more than he did the form representation. These are the two great unanalyzed forms of the imaginary of political economy that imposed their limits on him. The discourse of production and the discourse of representation are the mirror by which the system of political economy comes to be reflected in the imaginary and reproduced there as the determinant instance.
Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, page 20.
The chapter demands that the whole Marxist apparatus — productive forces, mode of production, relations of production, labor power — be questioned with the severity Marx aimed at exchange value. The hinge is the means/end split smuggled into the very definition of the human as producer.
Pages 21–22But is man's existence an end for which he must find the means? These innocent little phrases are already theoretical conclusions: the separation of the end from the means is the wildest and most naive postulate about the human race. Man has needs. Does he have needs? Is he pledged to satisfy them? Is he labor power (by which he separates himself as means from himself as his own end)? These prodigious metaphors of the system that dominates us are a fable of political economy retold to generations of revolutionaries infected even in their political radicalism by the conceptual viruses of this same political economy.
Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, pages 21–22.
End of the preview
You have read the opening of The Mirror of Production. Create an account to unlock the full SAARUTU brief and the rest of the research library.
